Test Information Guide

Field 72: Early Childhood
Sample Open-Response Item

The following materials contain:

Sample Test Directions for Open-Response Items

This section of the test consists of two open-response item assignments. You will be asked to prepare a written response of approximately 150–300 words for each assignment. You should use your time to plan, write, review, and edit your response for each assignment. You must write responses to both of the assignments.

For each assignment, read the topic and directions carefully before you begin to work. Think about how you will organize your response.

As a whole, your response to each assignment must demonstrate an understanding of the knowledge of the field. In your response to each assignment, you are expected to demonstrate the depth of your understanding of the subject area by applying your knowledge rather than by merely reciting factual information.

Your response to each assignment will be evaluated based on the following criteria.

The open-response item assignments are intended to assess subject knowledge. Your responses must be communicated clearly enough to permit valid judgment of the evaluation criteria by scorers. Your responses should be written for an audience of educators in this field. The final version of each response should conform to the conventions of edited American English. Your responses should be your original work, written in your own words, and not copied or paraphrased from some other work.

Be sure to write about the assigned topics. You may not use any reference materials during the test. Remember to review your work and make any changes you think will improve your responses.

Sample Open-Response Item

Objective 0011
Prepare an organized, well-developed analysis on a topic related to the development of concepts and processes related to mathematics.

Assignment

Use the information provided in the exhibits to complete the assignment that follows.

Using your knowledge of foundational mathematics skills and mathematics content and pedagogy, write a response of approximately 150–300 words in which you:

Be sure to cite specific evidence from the exhibits provided to support all parts of your response.

Exhibit 1

Lesson Plan

A prekindergarten class will name written numerals zero through ten and demonstrate one-to-one correspondence when counting objects up to ten. The following is an excerpt from the teacher's lesson plan.

Exhibit 2

Work Sample

For one of the center-based activities, children are instructed to count out objects for a given written numeral to be placed in corresponding cups. The conversation between the teacher and the child is shown below.

Sample Strong Response to the Open-Response Item

The sample response below reflects a strong knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.

The student's strength is the ability to count the correct number of objects upon teacher request. The student demonstrated one-to-one correspondence and the ability to identify amounts from 0-10 when directed by the teacher. This is supported by the teacher's conversation with the student during an opportunity for the student to demonstrate one-to-one correspondence from 0-10 as they counted three different amounts (four, seven, and five) of three different objects.

The student's need is recognizing written numerals and their quantities. The student did not recognize the numerals in the activity unless the teacher named them first. The student was unable to name the numerals 5, 7 and 2 on cups. The student counted out 7 seashells but ignored the teacher's comment that the numeral "4" was on the cup. Hearing the teacher say this, the student was able to count out 4 shells.  Attempting to count items/bears, the student did not attend to the cup's numeral, but concentrated on having counted 5 bears.

The student requires hands-on experiences that visually links the number of objects with the written numeral itself. The teacher will give the student direct, explicit instruction on a one-to-one basis to teach this skill. Interventions would include the teacher modeling and the student practicing the following: using hands-on 3-D numerals and linking them to the written numerals, tracing the numeral on paper, and matching it to the correct number of objects. The teacher will read a picture book that shows a different number of items on each page. The student has number cards (1 to 10). After the teacher reads each page, the student says and shows the correct number card corresponding to the amount. Next, the teacher has a stack of number cards (1 to 10). The student has a box of counting items. The teacher holds up a number card and asks the student to count out the number of items represented by the number on the card. When the student is correct, the student places the items in a bowl until the bowl is filled.

This would be effective in assisting the student in learning to recognize written numerals 0 to 10, seeing the numerals as representing quantities, and knowing which written numeral represents which quantity.

Scoring Rubric

Performance Characteristics

The following characteristics guide the scoring of responses to the open-response item(s).

Performance Characteristics
Purpose The extent to which the response achieves the purpose of the assignment.
Subject Matter Knowledge Accuracy and appropriateness in the application of subject matter knowledge.
Support Quality and relevance of supporting details.
Rationale Soundness of argument and degree of understanding of the subject matter.

Scoring Scale

The scoring scale below, which is related to the performance characteristics for the tests, is used by scorers in assigning scores to responses to the open-response item(s).

Score Scale with description for each score point.
Score Point Score Point Description
4 The "4" response reflects a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.
  • The purpose of the assignment is fully achieved.
  • There is substantial, accurate, and appropriate application of subject matter knowledge.
  • The supporting evidence is sound; there are high-quality, relevant examples.
  • The response reflects an ably reasoned, comprehensive understanding of the topic.
3 The "3" response reflects an adequate knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.
  • The purpose of the assignment is largely achieved.
  • There is a generally accurate and appropriate application of subject matter knowledge.
  • The supporting evidence is adequate; there are some acceptable, relevant examples.
  • The response reflects an adequately reasoned understanding of the topic.
2 The "2" response reflects a limited knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.
  • The purpose of the assignment is partially achieved.
  • There is a limited, possibly inaccurate or inappropriate, application of subject matter knowledge.
  • The supporting evidence is limited; there are few relevant examples.
  • The response reflects a limited, poorly reasoned understanding of the topic.
1 The "1" response reflects a weak knowledge and understanding of the subject matter.
  • The purpose of the assignment is not achieved.
  • There is little or no appropriate or accurate application of subject matter knowledge.
  • The supporting evidence, if present, is weak; there are few or no relevant examples.
  • The response reflects little or no reasoning about or understanding of the topic.
U The response is unrelated to the assigned topic, illegible, primarily in a language other than English, not of sufficient length to score, or merely a repetition of the assignment.
B There is no response to the assignment.